Generalizing the Sharp Threshold Phenomenon for the Distributed Complexity of the LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma

June 08, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sebastian Brandt, Christoph Grunau, VÑclav Rozhoň arXiv ID 2006.04625 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DC, cs.DM, math.CO Citations 13 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Recently, Brandt, Maus and Uitto [PODC'19] showed that, in a restricted setting, the dependency of the complexity of the distributed LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma (LLL) on the chosen LLL criterion exhibits a sharp threshold phenomenon: They proved that, under the LLL criterion $p2^d < 1$, if each random variable affects at most $3$ events, the deterministic complexity of the LLL in the LOCAL model is $O(d^2 + \log^* n)$. In stark contrast, under the criterion $p2^d \leq 1$, there is a randomized lower bound of $Ξ©(\log \log n)$ by Brandt et al. [STOC'16] and a deterministic lower bound of $Ξ©(\log n)$ by Chang, Kopelowitz and Pettie [FOCS'16]. Brandt, Maus and Uitto conjectured that the same behavior holds for the unrestricted setting where each random variable affects arbitrarily many events. We prove their conjecture, by providing an algorithm that solves the LLL in time $O(d^2 + \log^* n)$ under the LLL criterion $p2^d < 1$, which is tight in bounded-degree graphs due to an $Ξ©(\log^* n)$ lower bound by Chung, Pettie and Su [PODC'14]. By the work of Brandt, Maus and Uitto, obtaining such an algorithm can be reduced to proving that all members in a certain family of functions in arbitrarily high dimensions are convex on some specific domain. Unfortunately, an analytical description of these functions is known only for dimension at most $3$, which led to the aforementioned restriction of their result. While obtaining those descriptions for functions of (substantially) higher dimension seems out of the reach of current techniques, we show that their convexity can be inferred by combinatorial means.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted