Computing Shortest Paths and Diameter in the Hybrid Network Model
June 15, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Fabian Kuhn, Philipp Schneider
arXiv ID
2006.08408
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Citations
32
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
The $\mathsf{HYBRID}$ model, introduced in [Augustine et al., SODA '20], provides a theoretical foundation for networks that allow multiple communication modes. The model follows the principles of synchronous message passing, whereas nodes are allowed to use \textit{two} fundamentally different communication modes. First, a local mode where nodes may exchange arbitrary information per round over edges of a local communication graph $G$ (akin to the $\mathsf{LOCAL}$ model). Second, a global mode where every node may exchange $O(\log n)$ messages of size $O(\log n)$ bits per round with arbitrary nodes in the network. The $\mathsf{HYBRID}$ model intends to reflect the conditions of many real hybrid networks, where high-bandwidth but inherently local communication is combined with highly flexible global communication with restricted bandwidth. We continue to explore the power and limitations of the $\mathsf{HYBRID}$ model by investigating the complexity of computing shortest paths and diameter of the local communication graph $G$. We improve on the known upper bound for the exact all pairs shortest paths problem (APSP) from [Augustine et al., SODA '20] and provide algorithms to approximate solutions for the $k$ source shortest paths problem ($k$-SSSP). We demonstrate that our results for APSP and $k$-SSP are almost tight (up to poly-logarithmic factors). Furthermore, we give an improved algorithm for the exact single source shortest paths problem for graphs with large diameter. For the problem of approximating the diameter of the local communication network we give the first non-trivial upper bound. This upper bound is complemented by a lower bound for the exact diameter problem.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted