The role of metadata in reproducible computational research

June 15, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Patterns

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jeremy Leipzig, Daniel NΓΌst, Charles Tapley Hoyt, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Karthik Ram, Jane Greenberg arXiv ID 2006.08589 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.SE Citations 89 Venue Patterns Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Reproducible computational research (RCR) is the keystone of the scientific method for in silico analyses, packaging the transformation of raw data to published results. In addition to its role in research integrity, RCR has the capacity to significantly accelerate evaluation and reuse. This potential and wide-support for the FAIR principles have motivated interest in metadata standards supporting RCR. Metadata provides context and provenance to raw data and methods and is essential to both discovery and validation. Despite this shared connection with scientific data, few studies have explicitly described the relationship between metadata and RCR. This article employs a functional content analysis to identify metadata standards that support RCR functions across an analytic stack consisting of input data, tools, notebooks, pipelines, and publications. Our article provides background context, explores gaps, and discovers component trends of embeddedness and methodology weight from which we derive recommendations for future work.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted