Machine Learning Pipelines: Provenance, Reproducibility and FAIR Data Principles

June 22, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Provenance and Annotation Workshop

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sheeba Samuel, Frank Lรถffler, Birgitta Kรถnig-Ries arXiv ID 2006.12117 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, stat.ML Citations 46 Venue International Provenance and Annotation Workshop Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly important scientific tool supporting decision making and knowledge generation in numerous fields. With this, it also becomes more and more important that the results of ML experiments are reproducible. Unfortunately, that often is not the case. Rather, ML, similar to many other disciplines, faces a reproducibility crisis. In this paper, we describe our goals and initial steps in supporting the end-to-end reproducibility of ML pipelines. We investigate which factors beyond the availability of source code and datasets influence reproducibility of ML experiments. We propose ways to apply FAIR data practices to ML workflows. We present our preliminary results on the role of our tool, ProvBook, in capturing and comparing provenance of ML experiments and their reproducibility using Jupyter Notebooks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted