Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attacks

June 22, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Conference on Machine Learning

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Avi Schwarzschild, Micah Goldblum, Arjun Gupta, John P Dickerson, Tom Goldstein arXiv ID 2006.12557 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.CV, cs.CY, stat.ML Citations 197 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Data poisoning and backdoor attacks manipulate training data in order to cause models to fail during inference. A recent survey of industry practitioners found that data poisoning is the number one concern among threats ranging from model stealing to adversarial attacks. However, it remains unclear exactly how dangerous poisoning methods are and which ones are more effective considering that these methods, even ones with identical objectives, have not been tested in consistent or realistic settings. We observe that data poisoning and backdoor attacks are highly sensitive to variations in the testing setup. Moreover, we find that existing methods may not generalize to realistic settings. While these existing works serve as valuable prototypes for data poisoning, we apply rigorous tests to determine the extent to which we should fear them. In order to promote fair comparison in future work, we develop standardized benchmarks for data poisoning and backdoor attacks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted