Provably and Efficiently Approximating Near-cliques using the Turรกn Shadow: PEANUTS

June 24, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› The Web Conference

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shweta Jain, C. Seshadhri arXiv ID 2006.13483 Category cs.SI: Social & Info Networks Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 24 Venue The Web Conference Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Clique and near-clique counts are important graph properties with applications in graph generation, graph modeling, graph analytics, community detection among others. They are the archetypal examples of dense subgraphs. While there are several different definitions of near-cliques, most of them share the attribute that they are cliques that are missing a small number of edges. Clique counting is itself considered a challenging problem. Counting near-cliques is significantly harder more so since the search space for near-cliques is orders of magnitude larger than that of cliques. We give a formulation of a near-clique as a clique that is missing a constant number of edges. We exploit the fact that a near-clique contains a smaller clique, and use techniques for clique sampling to count near-cliques. This method allows us to count near-cliques with 1 or 2 missing edges, in graphs with tens of millions of edges. To the best of our knowledge, there was no known efficient method for this problem, and we obtain a 10x - 100x speedup over existing algorithms for counting near-cliques. Our main technique is a space-efficient adaptation of the Turรกn Shadow sampling approach, recently introduced by Jain and Seshadhri (WWW 2017). This approach constructs a large recursion tree (called the Turรกn Shadow) that represents cliques in a graph. We design a novel algorithm that builds an estimator for near-cliques, using an online, compact construction of the Turรกn Shadow.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Social & Info Networks

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted