Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Vision

July 29, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Milagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling Yang arXiv ID 2007.14886 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CV, cs.LG Citations 109 Venue Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The interpretation of data is fundamental to machine learning. This paper investigates practices of image data annotation as performed in industrial contexts. We define data annotation as a sense-making practice, where annotators assign meaning to data through the use of labels. Previous human-centered investigations have largely focused on annotators subjectivity as a major cause for biased labels. We propose a wider view on this issue: guided by constructivist grounded theory, we conducted several weeks of fieldwork at two annotation companies. We analyzed which structures, power relations, and naturalized impositions shape the interpretation of data. Our results show that the work of annotators is profoundly informed by the interests, values, and priorities of other actors above their station. Arbitrary classifications are vertically imposed on annotators, and through them, on data. This imposition is largely naturalized. Assigning meaning to data is often presented as a technical matter. This paper shows it is, in fact, an exercise of power with multiple implications for individuals and society.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted