A Comparative Study of AI-based Intrusion Detection Techniques in Critical Infrastructures

July 24, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Trans. Internet Techn.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Safa Otoum, Burak Kantarci, Hussein Mouftah arXiv ID 2008.00088 Category cs.NI: Networking & Internet Cross-listed cs.DC, cs.LG Citations 46 Venue ACM Trans. Internet Techn. Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Volunteer computing uses Internet-connected devices (laptops, PCs, smart devices, etc.), in which their owners volunteer them as storage and computing power resources, has become an essential mechanism for resource management in numerous applications. The growth of the volume and variety of data traffic in the Internet leads to concerns on the robustness of cyberphysical systems especially for critical infrastructures. Therefore, the implementation of an efficient Intrusion Detection System for gathering such sensory data has gained vital importance. In this paper, we present a comparative study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven intrusion detection systems for wirelessly connected sensors that track crucial applications. Specifically, we present an in-depth analysis of the use of machine learning, deep learning and reinforcement learning solutions to recognize intrusive behavior in the collected traffic. We evaluate the proposed mechanisms by using KD'99 as real attack data-set in our simulations. Results present the performance metrics for three different IDSs namely the Adaptively Supervised and Clustered Hybrid IDS (ASCH-IDS), Restricted Boltzmann Machine-based Clustered IDS (RBC-IDS) and Q-learning based IDS (QL-IDS) to detect malicious behaviors. We also present the performance of different reinforcement learning techniques such as State-Action-Reward-State-Action Learning (SARSA) and the Temporal Difference learning (TD). Through simulations, we show that QL-IDS performs with 100% detection rate while SARSA-IDS and TD-IDS perform at the order of 99.5%.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Networking & Internet

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted