Word Error Rate Estimation Without ASR Output: e-WER2

August 08, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Interspeech

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ahmed Ali, Steve Renals arXiv ID 2008.03403 Category eess.AS: Audio & Speech Cross-listed cs.CL, cs.SD Citations 15 Venue Interspeech Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Measuring the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems requires manually transcribed data in order to compute the word error rate (WER), which is often time-consuming and expensive. In this paper, we continue our effort in estimating WER using acoustic, lexical and phonotactic features. Our novel approach to estimate the WER uses a multistream end-to-end architecture. We report results for systems using internal speech decoder features (glass-box), systems without speech decoder features (black-box), and for systems without having access to the ASR system (no-box). The no-box system learns joint acoustic-lexical representation from phoneme recognition results along with MFCC acoustic features to estimate WER. Considering WER per sentence, our no-box system achieves 0.56 Pearson correlation with the reference evaluation and 0.24 root mean square error (RMSE) across 1,400 sentences. The estimated overall WER by e-WER2 is 30.9% for a three hours test set, while the WER computed using the reference transcriptions was 28.5%.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Audio & Speech

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted