On Efficient Low Distortion Ultrametric Embedding
August 15, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Machine Learning
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Vincent Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., Guillaume Lagarde
arXiv ID
2008.06700
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC,
cs.CG,
cs.LG,
math.MG
Citations
13
Venue
International Conference on Machine Learning
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
A classic problem in unsupervised learning and data analysis is to find simpler and easy-to-visualize representations of the data that preserve its essential properties. A widely-used method to preserve the underlying hierarchical structure of the data while reducing its complexity is to find an embedding of the data into a tree or an ultrametric. The most popular algorithms for this task are the classic linkage algorithms (single, average, or complete). However, these methods on a data set of $n$ points in $Ξ©(\log n)$ dimensions exhibit a quite prohibitive running time of $Ξ(n^2)$. In this paper, we provide a new algorithm which takes as input a set of points $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and for every $c\ge 1$, runs in time $n^{1+\fracΟ{c^2}}$ (for some universal constant $Ο>1$) to output an ultrametric $Ξ$ such that for any two points $u,v$ in $P$, we have $Ξ(u,v)$ is within a multiplicative factor of $5c$ to the distance between $u$ and $v$ in the "best" ultrametric representation of $P$. Here, the best ultrametric is the ultrametric $\tildeΞ$ that minimizes the maximum distance distortion with respect to the $\ell_2$ distance, namely that minimizes $\underset{u,v \in P}{\max}\ \frac{\tildeΞ(u,v)}{\|u-v\|_2}$. We complement the above result by showing that under popular complexity theoretic assumptions, for every constant $\varepsilon>0$, no algorithm with running time $n^{2-\varepsilon}$ can distinguish between inputs in $\ell_\infty$-metric that admit isometric embedding and those that incur a distortion of $\frac{3}{2}$. Finally, we present empirical evaluation on classic machine learning datasets and show that the output of our algorithm is comparable to the output of the linkage algorithms while achieving a much faster running time.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted