Bridging the Gap between Optimal Trajectory Planning and Safety-Critical Control with Applications to Autonomous Vehicles
August 17, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ at - Automatisierungstechnik
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Wei Xiao, Christos G. Cassandras, Calin A. Belta
arXiv ID
2008.07632
Category
eess.SY: Systems & Control (EE)
Cross-listed
cs.RO
Citations
87
Venue
at - Automatisierungstechnik
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
We address the problem of optimizing the performance of a dynamic system while satisfying hard safety constraints at all times. Implementing an optimal control solution is limited by the computational cost required to derive it in real time, especially when constraints become active, as well as the need to rely on simple linear dynamics, simple objective functions, and ignoring noise. The recently proposed Control Barrier Function (CBF) method may be used for safety-critical control at the expense of sub-optimal performance. In this paper, we develop a real-time control framework that combines optimal trajectories generated through optimal control with the computationally efficient CBF method providing safety guarantees. We use Hamiltonian analysis to obtain a tractable optimal solution for a linear or linearized system, then employ High Order CBFs (HOCBFs) and Control Lyapunov Functions (CLFs) to account for constraints with arbitrary relative degrees and to track the optimal state, respectively. We further show how to deal with noise in arbitrary relative degree systems. The proposed framework is then applied to the optimal traffic merging problem for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) where the objective is to jointly minimize the travel time and energy consumption of each CAV subject to speed, acceleration, and speed-dependent safety constraints. In addition, when considering more complex objective functions, nonlinear dynamics and passenger comfort requirements for which analytical optimal control solutions are unavailable, we adapt the HOCBF method to such problems. Simulation examples are included to compare the performance of the proposed framework to optimal solutions (when available) and to a baseline provided by human-driven vehicles with results showing significant improvements in all metrics.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Systems & Control (EE)
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Incremental Gradient, Subgradient, and Proximal Methods for Convex Optimization: A Survey
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Wireless Network Design for Control Systems: A Survey
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Exploration
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Function
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Novel Multidimensional Models of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted