Comparative Evaluation of Pretrained Transfer Learning Models on Automatic Short Answer Grading

September 02, 2020 Β· Entered Twilight Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era β€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (β‰₯5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: .gitignore, LICENSE, README.md, comparative_evaluation_on_mohler_dataset, images

Authors Sasi Kiran Gaddipati, Deebul Nair, Paul G. Plâger arXiv ID 2009.01303 Category cs.CL: Computation & Language Citations 38 Venue arXiv.org Repository https://github.com/gsasikiran/Evaluation-of-transfer-learning-models-on-automatic-short-answer-grading ⭐ 14 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Automatic Short Answer Grading (ASAG) is the process of grading the student answers by computational approaches given a question and the desired answer. Previous works implemented the methods of concept mapping, facet mapping, and some used the conventional word embeddings for extracting semantic features. They extracted multiple features manually to train on the corresponding datasets. We use pretrained embeddings of the transfer learning models, ELMo, BERT, GPT, and GPT-2 to assess their efficiency on this task. We train with a single feature, cosine similarity, extracted from the embeddings of these models. We compare the RMSE scores and correlation measurements of the four models with previous works on Mohler dataset. Our work demonstrates that ELMo outperformed the other three models. We also, briefly describe the four transfer learning models and conclude with the possible causes of poor results of transfer learning models.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computation & Language

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Attention Is All You Need

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, ... (+6 more)

cs.CL πŸ› NeurIPS πŸ“š 166.0K cites 8 years ago