Faster motif counting via succinct color coding and adaptive sampling

September 04, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Marco Bressan, Stefano Leucci, Alessandro Panconesi arXiv ID 2009.03052 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DB Citations 13 Venue ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We address the problem of computing the distribution of induced connected subgraphs, aka \emph{graphlets} or \emph{motifs}, in large graphs. The current state-of-the-art algorithms estimate the motif counts via uniform sampling, by leveraging the color coding technique by Alon, Yuster and Zwick. In this work we extend the applicability of this approach, by introducing a set of algorithmic optimizations and techniques that reduce the running time and space usage of color coding and improve the accuracy of the counts. To this end, we first show how to optimize color coding to efficiently build a compact table of a representative subsample of all graphlets in the input graph. For $8$-node motifs, we can build such a table in one hour for a graph with $65$M nodes and $1.8$B edges, which is $2000$ times larger than the state of the art. We then introduce a novel adaptive sampling scheme that breaks the "additive error barrier" of uniform sampling, guaranteeing multiplicative approximations instead of just additive ones. This allows us to count not only the most frequent motifs, but also extremely rare ones. For instance, on one graph we accurately count nearly $10.000$ distinct $8$-node motifs whose relative frequency is so small that uniform sampling would literally take centuries to find them. Our results show that color coding is still the most promising approach to scalable motif counting.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted