Strengthening Order Preserving Encryption with Differential Privacy

September 11, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Conference on Computer and Communications Security

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Bolin Ding, Somesh Jha, Weiran Liu, Jingren Zhou arXiv ID 2009.05679 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 12 Venue Conference on Computer and Communications Security Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Ciphertexts of an order-preserving encryption (OPE) scheme preserve the order of their corresponding plaintexts. However, OPEs are vulnerable to inference attacks that exploit this preserved order. At another end, differential privacy has become the de-facto standard for achieving data privacy. One of the most attractive properties of DP is that any post-processing (inferential) computation performed on the noisy output of a DP algorithm does not degrade its privacy guarantee. In this paper, we propose a novel differentially private order preserving encryption scheme, OP$Ξ΅$. Under OP$Ξ΅$, the leakage of order from the ciphertexts is differentially private. As a result, in the least, OP$Ξ΅$ ensures a formal guarantee (specifically, a relaxed DP guarantee) even in the face of inference attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to combine DP with a property-preserving encryption scheme. We demonstrate OP$Ξ΅$'s practical utility in answering range queries via extensive empirical evaluation on four real-world datasets. For instance, OP$Ξ΅$ misses only around $4$ in every $10K$ correct records on average for a dataset of size $\sim732K$ with an attribute of domain size $\sim18K$ and $Ξ΅= 1$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted