Anisotropic 3D Multi-Stream CNN for Accurate Prostate Segmentation from Multi-Planar MRI

September 23, 2020 Β· Entered Twilight Β· πŸ› Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.

πŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era β€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (β‰₯5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: .gitignore, LICENSE, Network.PNG, README.md, UNET3D_MultiStream_v2.py, data, dataAugmentation.py, data_generation.py, elastic_deformation.py, example_configspace.py, generateTrainingData.py, hpo_server.py, hpo_worker.py, inference.py, models, out, out_dir, output.nrrd, preprocessing.py, requirements.txt, tensorboard, train.py, utils.py, worker.py

Authors Anneke Meyer, Grzegorz Chlebus, Marko Rak, Daniel Schindele, Martin Schostak, Bram van Ginneken, Andrea Schenk, Hans Meine, Horst K. Hahn, Andreas Schreiber, Christian Hansen arXiv ID 2009.11120 Category eess.IV: Image & Video Processing Cross-listed cs.CV Citations 48 Venue Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. Repository https://github.com/AnnekeMeyer/AnisotropicMultiStreamCNN ⭐ 14 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Background and Objective: Accurate and reliable segmentation of the prostate gland in MR images can support the clinical assessment of prostate cancer, as well as the planning and monitoring of focal and loco-regional therapeutic interventions. Despite the availability of multi-planar MR scans due to standardized protocols, the majority of segmentation approaches presented in the literature consider the axial scans only. Methods: We propose an anisotropic 3D multi-stream CNN architecture, which processes additional scan directions to produce a higher-resolution isotropic prostate segmentation. We investigate two variants of our architecture, which work on two (dual-plane) and three (triple-plane) image orientations, respectively. We compare them with the standard baseline (single-plane) used in literature, i.e., plain axial segmentation. To realize a fair comparison, we employ a hyperparameter optimization strategy to select optimal configurations for the individual approaches. Results: Training and evaluation on two datasets spanning multiple sites obtain statistical significant improvement over the plain axial segmentation ($p<0.05$ on the Dice similarity coefficient). The improvement can be observed especially at the base ($0.898$ single-plane vs. $0.906$ triple-plane) and apex ($0.888$ single-plane vs. $0.901$ dual-plane). Conclusion: This study indicates that models employing two or three scan directions are superior to plain axial segmentation. The knowledge of precise boundaries of the prostate is crucial for the conservation of risk structures. Thus, the proposed models have the potential to improve the outcome of prostate cancer diagnosis and therapies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Image & Video Processing