Maximum Covering Subtrees for Phylogenetic Networks
September 25, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology & Bioinformatics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Nathan Davidov, Amanda Hernandez, Justin Jian, Patrick McKenna, K. A. Medlin, Roadra Mojumder, Megan Owen, Andrew Quijano, Amanda Rodriguez, Katherine St. John, Katherine Thai, Meliza Uraga
arXiv ID
2009.12413
Category
q-bio.PE
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
3
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology & Bioinformatics
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Tree-based phylogenetic networks, which may be roughly defined as leaf-labeled networks built by adding arcs only between the original tree edges, have elegant properties for modeling evolutionary histories. We answer an open question of Francis, Semple, and Steel about the complexity of determining how far a phylogenetic network is from being tree-based, including non-binary phylogenetic networks. We show that finding a phylogenetic tree covering the maximum number of nodes in a phylogenetic network can be be computed in polynomial time via an encoding into a minimum-cost maximum flow problem.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ q-bio.PE
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Simulating COVID-19 in a University Environment
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
How morphological development can guide evolution
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Evolutionary forces in language change
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Entropy and Diversity: The Axiomatic Approach
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted