Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
September 26, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Information Processing & Management
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ashish Rajendra Sai, Jim Buckley, Brian Fitzgerald, Andrew Le Gear
arXiv ID
2009.12542
Category
cs.CY: Computers & Society
Cross-listed
cs.CR
Citations
109
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. After the introduction of Bitcoin, the field of cryptocurrency has seen widespread attention from industry and academia, so much so that the original novel contribution of Bitcoin i.e. decentralization, may be overlooked, due to decentralizations assumed fundamental existence for the functioning of such cryptoassets. However recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. As this increased centralization has an impact the security of the blockchain, it is crucial that it is measured, towards adequate control. This research derives an initial taxonomy of centralization present in decentralized blockchains through rigorous synthesis using a systematic literature review. This is followed by iterative refinement through expert interviews. We systematically analyzed 89 research papers published between 2009 and 2019. Our study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the multiple definitions and measurements of centralization in the literature. We identify different aspects of centralization and propose an encompassing taxonomy of centralization concerns. This taxonomy is based on empirically observable and measurable characteristics. It consists of 13 aspects of centralization classified over six architectural layers Governance Network Consensus Incentive Operational and Application. We also discuss how the implications of centralization can vary depending on the aspects studied. We believe that this review and taxonomy provides a comprehensive overview of centralization in decentralized blockchains involving various conceptualizations and measures.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computers & Society
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Green AI
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted