The smoothed complexity of Frank-Wolfe methods via conditioning of random matrices and polytopes

September 26, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Mathematical Statistics and Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Luis Rademacher, Chang Shu arXiv ID 2009.12685 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.OC, math.PR Citations 8 Venue Mathematical Statistics and Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Frank-Wolfe methods are popular for optimization over a polytope. One of the reasons is because they do not need projection onto the polytope but only linear optimization over it. To understand its complexity, Lacoste-Julien and Jaggi introduced a condition number for polytopes and showed linear convergence for several variations of the method. The actual running time can still be exponential in the worst case (when the condition number is exponential). We study the smoothed complexity of the condition number, namely the condition number of small random perturbations of the input polytope and show that it is polynomial for any simplex and exponential for general polytopes. Our results also apply to other condition measures of polytopes that have been proposed for the analysis of Frank-Wolfe methods: vertex-facet distance (Beck and Shtern) and facial distance (PeΓ±a and RodrΓ­guez). Our argument for polytopes is a refinement of an argument that we develop to study the conditioning of random matrices. The basic argument shows that for $c>1$ a $d$-by-$n$ random Gaussian matrix with $n \geq cd$ has a $d$-by-$d$ submatrix with minimum singular value that is exponentially small with high probability. This has consequences on results about the robust uniqueness of tensor decompositions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted