Machines Learn to Infer Stellar Parameters Just by Looking at a Large Number of Spectra

September 27, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nima Sedaghat, Martino Romaniello, Jonathan E. Carrick, FranΓ§ois-Xavier Pineau arXiv ID 2009.12872 Category astro-ph.IM Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 12 Venue Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Machine learning has been widely applied to clearly defined problems of astronomy and astrophysics. However, deep learning and its conceptual differences to classical machine learning have been largely overlooked in these fields. The broad hypothesis behind our work is that letting the abundant real astrophysical data speak for itself, with minimal supervision and no labels, can reveal interesting patterns which may facilitate discovery of novel physical relationships. Here as the first step, we seek to interpret the representations a deep convolutional neural network chooses to learn, and find correlations in them with current physical understanding. We train an encoder-decoder architecture on the self-supervised auxiliary task of reconstruction to allow it to learn general representations without bias towards any specific task. By exerting weak disentanglement at the information bottleneck of the network, we implicitly enforce interpretability in the learned features. We develop two independent statistical and information-theoretical methods for finding the number of learned informative features, as well as measuring their true correlation with astrophysical validation labels. As a case study, we apply this method to a dataset of ~270000 stellar spectra, each of which comprising ~300000 dimensions. We find that the network clearly assigns specific nodes to estimate (notions of) parameters such as radial velocity and effective temperature without being asked to do so, all in a completely physics-agnostic process. This supports the first part of our hypothesis. Moreover, we find with high confidence that there are ~4 more independently informative dimensions that do not show a direct correlation with our validation parameters, presenting potential room for future studies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” astro-ph.IM

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted