Approximation algorithms for connectivity augmentation problems

September 28, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Computer Science Symposium in Russia

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zeev Nutov arXiv ID 2009.13257 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 15 Venue Computer Science Symposium in Russia Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In Connectivity Augmentation problems we are given a graph $H=(V,E_H)$ and an edge set $E$ on $V$, and seek a min-size edge set $J \subseteq E$ such that $H \cup J$ has larger edge/node connectivity than $H$. In the Edge-Connectivity Augmentation problem we need to increase the edge-connectivity by $1$. In the Block-Tree Augmentation problem $H$ is connected and $H \cup S$ should be $2$-connected. In Leaf-to-Leaf Connectivity Augmentation problems every edge in $E$ connects minimal deficient sets. For this version we give a simple combinatorial approximation algorithm with ratio $5/3$, improving the previous $1.91$ approximation that applies for the general case. We also show by a simple proof that if the Steiner Tree problem admits approximation ratio $Ξ±$ then the general version admits approximation ratio $1+\ln(4-x)+Ξ΅$, where $x$ is the solution to the equation $1+\ln(4-x)=Ξ±+(Ξ±-1)x$. For the currently best value of $Ξ±=\ln 4+Ξ΅$ this gives ratio $1.942$. This is slightly worse than the best ratio $1.91$, but has the advantage of using Steiner Tree approximation as a "black box", giving ratio $< 1.9$ if ratio $Ξ±\leq 1.35$ can be achieved. In the Element Connectivity Augmentation problem we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$, $S \subseteq V$, and connectivity requirements $\{r(u,v):u,v \in S\}$. The goal is to find a min-size set $J$ of new edges on $S$ such that for all $u,v \in S$ the graph $G \cup J$ contains $r(u,v)$ $uv$-paths such that no two of them have an edge or a node in $V \setminus S$ in common. The problem is NP-hard even when $\max_{u,v \in S} r(u,v)=2$. We obtain approximation ratio $3/2$, improving the previous ratio $7/4$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted