Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms

October 04, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Arun Ganesh, Jiazheng Zhao arXiv ID 2010.01457 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 11 Venue Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the problem of answering $k$ counting (i.e. sensitivity-1) queries about a database with $(Ξ΅, Ξ΄)$-differential privacy. We give a mechanism such that if the true answers to the queries are the vector $d$, the mechanism outputs answers $\tilde{d}$ with the $\ell_\infty$-error guarantee: $$\mathcal{E}\left[||\tilde{d} - d||_\infty\right] = O\left(\frac{\sqrt{k \log \log \log k \log(1/Ξ΄)}}Ξ΅\right).$$ This reduces the multiplicative gap between the best known upper and lower bounds on $\ell_\infty$-error from $O(\sqrt{\log \log k})$ to $O(\sqrt{\log \log \log k})$. Our main technical contribution is an analysis of the family of mechanisms of the following form for answering counting queries: Sample $x$ from a \textit{Generalized Gaussian}, i.e. with probability proportional to $\exp(-(||x||_p/Οƒ)^p)$, and output $\tilde{d} = d + x$. This family of mechanisms offers a tradeoff between $\ell_1$ and $\ell_\infty$-error guarantees and may be of independent interest. For $p = O(\log \log k)$, this mechanism already matches the previous best known $\ell_\infty$-error bound. We arrive at our main result by composing this mechanism for $p = O(\log \log \log k)$ with the sparse vector mechanism, generalizing a technique of Steinke and Ullman.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted