What is the best data augmentation for 3D brain tumor segmentation?

October 26, 2020 Β· Entered Twilight Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era β€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (β‰₯5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: README.md, augmentation.py, class_weights.npy, unet3D.py

Authors Marco Domenico Cirillo, David Abramian, Anders Eklund arXiv ID 2010.13372 Category eess.IV: Image & Video Processing Cross-listed cs.CV, cs.LG Citations 4 Venue arXiv.org Repository https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques ⭐ 24 Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Training segmentation networks requires large annotated datasets, which in medical imaging can be hard to obtain. Despite this fact, data augmentation has in our opinion not been fully explored for brain tumor segmentation. In this project we apply different types of data augmentation (flipping, rotation, scaling, brightness adjustment, elastic deformation) when training a standard 3D U-Net, and demonstrate that augmentation significantly improves the network's performance in many cases. Our conclusion is that brightness augmentation and elastic deformation work best, and that combinations of different augmentation techniques do not provide further improvement compared to only using one augmentation technique. Our code is available at https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Image & Video Processing