What is the best data augmentation for 3D brain tumor segmentation?
October 26, 2020 Β· Entered Twilight Β· π arXiv.org
"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (β₯5 year threshold)"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Repo contents: README.md, augmentation.py, class_weights.npy, unet3D.py
Authors
Marco Domenico Cirillo, David Abramian, Anders Eklund
arXiv ID
2010.13372
Category
eess.IV: Image & Video Processing
Cross-listed
cs.CV,
cs.LG
Citations
4
Venue
arXiv.org
Repository
https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques
β 24
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Training segmentation networks requires large annotated datasets, which in medical imaging can be hard to obtain. Despite this fact, data augmentation has in our opinion not been fully explored for brain tumor segmentation. In this project we apply different types of data augmentation (flipping, rotation, scaling, brightness adjustment, elastic deformation) when training a standard 3D U-Net, and demonstrate that augmentation significantly improves the network's performance in many cases. Our conclusion is that brightness augmentation and elastic deformation work best, and that combinations of different augmentation techniques do not provide further improvement compared to only using one augmentation technique. Our code is available at https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Image & Video Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Dataset
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Algorithm Unrolling: Interpretable, Efficient Deep Learning for Signal and Image Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted