Hogwild! over Distributed Local Data Sets with Linearly Increasing Mini-Batch Sizes

October 27, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Marten van Dijk, Nhuong V. Nguyen, Toan N. Nguyen, Lam M. Nguyen, Quoc Tran-Dinh, Phuong Ha Nguyen arXiv ID 2010.14763 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed math.OC, stat.ML Citations 10 Venue International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Hogwild! implements asynchronous Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) where multiple threads in parallel access a common repository containing training data, perform SGD iterations and update shared state that represents a jointly learned (global) model. We consider big data analysis where training data is distributed among local data sets in a heterogeneous way -- and we wish to move SGD computations to local compute nodes where local data resides. The results of these local SGD computations are aggregated by a central "aggregator" which mimics Hogwild!. We show how local compute nodes can start choosing small mini-batch sizes which increase to larger ones in order to reduce communication cost (round interaction with the aggregator). We improve state-of-the-art literature and show $O(\sqrt{K}$) communication rounds for heterogeneous data for strongly convex problems, where $K$ is the total number of gradient computations across all local compute nodes. For our scheme, we prove a \textit{tight} and novel non-trivial convergence analysis for strongly convex problems for {\em heterogeneous} data which does not use the bounded gradient assumption as seen in many existing publications. The tightness is a consequence of our proofs for lower and upper bounds of the convergence rate, which show a constant factor difference. We show experimental results for plain convex and non-convex problems for biased (i.e., heterogeneous) and unbiased local data sets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted