Progressive Voice Trigger Detection: Accuracy vs Latency

October 29, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Siddharth Sigtia, John Bridle, Hywel Richards, Pascal Clark, Erik Marchi, Vineet Garg arXiv ID 2010.15446 Category eess.AS: Audio & Speech Cross-listed cs.HC, cs.LG, cs.SD Citations 11 Venue IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
We present an architecture for voice trigger detection for virtual assistants. The main idea in this work is to exploit information in words that immediately follow the trigger phrase. We first demonstrate that by including more audio context after a detected trigger phrase, we can indeed get a more accurate decision. However, waiting to listen to more audio each time incurs a latency increase. Progressive Voice Trigger Detection allows us to trade-off latency and accuracy by accepting clear trigger candidates quickly, but waiting for more context to decide whether to accept more marginal examples. Using a two-stage architecture, we show that by delaying the decision for just 3% of detected true triggers in the test set, we are able to obtain a relative improvement of 66% in false rejection rate, while incurring only a negligible increase in latency.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Audio & Speech

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted