Simple and optimal methods for stochastic variational inequalities, II: Markovian noise and policy evaluation in reinforcement learning
November 15, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π SIAM Journal on Optimization
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Georgios Kotsalis, Guanghui Lan, Tianjiao Li
arXiv ID
2011.08434
Category
math.OC: Optimization & Control
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG
Citations
36
Venue
SIAM Journal on Optimization
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
The focus of this paper is on stochastic variational inequalities (VI) under Markovian noise. A prominent application of our algorithmic developments is the stochastic policy evaluation problem in reinforcement learning. Prior investigations in the literature focused on temporal difference (TD) learning by employing nonsmooth finite time analysis motivated by stochastic subgradient descent leading to certain limitations. These encompass the requirement of analyzing a modified TD algorithm that involves projection to an a-priori defined Euclidean ball, achieving a non-optimal convergence rate and no clear way of deriving the beneficial effects of parallel implementation. Our approach remedies these shortcomings in the broader context of stochastic VIs and in particular when it comes to stochastic policy evaluation. We developed a variety of simple TD learning type algorithms motivated by its original version that maintain its simplicity, while offering distinct advantages from a non-asymptotic analysis point of view. We first provide an improved analysis of the standard TD algorithm that can benefit from parallel implementation. Then we present versions of a conditional TD algorithm (CTD), that involves periodic updates of the stochastic iterates, which reduce the bias and therefore exhibit improved iteration complexity. This brings us to the fast TD (FTD) algorithm which combines elements of CTD and the stochastic operator extrapolation method of the companion paper. For a novel index resetting policy FTD exhibits the best known convergence rate. We also devised a robust version of the algorithm that is particularly suitable for discounting factors close to 1.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Optimization & Control
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programming
π
π
The Cartographer
A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learned Primal-dual Reconstruction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted