Towards the sampling LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma

November 24, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Vishesh Jain, Huy Tuan Pham, Thuy Duong Vuong arXiv ID 2011.12196 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.CO, math.PR Citations 26 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Let $Ξ¦= (V, \mathcal{C})$ be a constraint satisfaction problem on variables $v_1,\dots, v_n$ such that each constraint depends on at most $k$ variables and such that each variable assumes values in an alphabet of size at most $[q]$. Suppose that each constraint shares variables with at most $Ξ”$ constraints and that each constraint is violated with probability at most $p$ (under the product measure on its variables). We show that for $k, q = O(1)$, there is a deterministic, polynomial time algorithm to approximately count the number of satisfying assignments and a randomized, polynomial time algorithm to sample from approximately the uniform distribution on satisfying assignments, provided that \[C\cdot q^{3}\cdot k \cdot p \cdot Ξ”^{7} < 1, \quad \text{where }C \text{ is an absolute constant.}\] Previously, a result of this form was known essentially only in the special case when each constraint is violated by exactly one assignment to its variables. For the special case of $k$-CNF formulas, the term $Ξ”^{7}$ improves the previously best known $Ξ”^{60}$ for deterministic algorithms [Moitra, J.ACM, 2019] and $Ξ”^{13}$ for randomized algorithms [Feng et al., arXiv, 2020]. For the special case of properly $q$-coloring $k$-uniform hypergraphs, the term $Ξ”^{7}$ improves the previously best known $Ξ”^{14}$ for deterministic algorithms [Guo et al., SICOMP, 2019] and $Ξ”^{9}$ for randomized algorithms [Feng et al., arXiv, 2020].
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted