Low depth algorithms for quantum amplitude estimation

December 06, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Quantum

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tudor Giurgica-Tiron, Iordanis Kerenidis, Farrokh Labib, Anupam Prakash, William Zeng arXiv ID 2012.03348 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 89 Venue Quantum Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We design and analyze two new low depth algorithms for amplitude estimation (AE) achieving an optimal tradeoff between the quantum speedup and circuit depth. For $Ξ²\in (0,1]$, our algorithms require $N= \tilde{O}( \frac{1}{ Ξ΅^{1+Ξ²}})$ oracle calls and require the oracle to be called sequentially $D= O( \frac{1}{ Ξ΅^{1-Ξ²}})$ times to perform amplitude estimation within additive error $Ξ΅$. These algorithms interpolate between the classical algorithm $(Ξ²=1)$ and the standard quantum algorithm ($Ξ²=0$) and achieve a tradeoff $ND= O(1/Ξ΅^{2})$. These algorithms bring quantum speedups for Monte Carlo methods closer to realization, as they can provide speedups with shallower circuits. The first algorithm (Power law AE) uses power law schedules in the framework introduced by Suzuki et al \cite{S20}. The algorithm works for $Ξ²\in (0,1]$ and has provable correctness guarantees when the log-likelihood function satisfies regularity conditions required for the Bernstein Von-Mises theorem. The second algorithm (QoPrime AE) uses the Chinese remainder theorem for combining lower depth estimates to achieve higher accuracy. The algorithm works for discrete $Ξ²=q/k$ where $k \geq 2$ is the number of distinct coprime moduli used by the algorithm and $1 \leq q \leq k-1$, and has a fully rigorous correctness proof. We analyze both algorithms in the presence of depolarizing noise and provide numerical comparisons with the state of the art amplitude estimation algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Variational Quantum Algorithms

M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, ... (+9 more)

quant-ph πŸ› Nature Reviews Physics πŸ“š 3.3K cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted