Design and Analysis of Uplink and Downlink Communications for Federated Learning
December 07, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sihui Zheng, Cong Shen, Xiang Chen
arXiv ID
2012.04057
Category
cs.IT: Information Theory
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
eess.SP
Citations
179
Venue
ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Communication has been known to be one of the primary bottlenecks of federated learning (FL), and yet existing studies have not addressed the efficient communication design, particularly in wireless FL where both uplink and downlink communications have to be considered. In this paper, we focus on the design and analysis of physical layer quantization and transmission methods for wireless FL. We answer the question of what and how to communicate between clients and the parameter server and evaluate the impact of the various quantization and transmission options of the updated model on the learning performance. We provide new convergence analysis of the well-known FedAvg under non-i.i.d. dataset distributions, partial clients participation, and finite-precision quantization in uplink and downlink communications. These analyses reveal that, in order to achieve an O(1/T) convergence rate with quantization, transmitting the weight requires increasing the quantization level at a logarithmic rate, while transmitting the weight differential can keep a constant quantization level. Comprehensive numerical evaluation on various real-world datasets reveals that the benefit of a FL-tailored uplink and downlink communication design is enormous - a carefully designed quantization and transmission achieves more than 98% of the floating-point baseline accuracy with fewer than 10% of the baseline bandwidth, for majority of the experiments on both i.i.d. and non-i.i.d. datasets. In particular, 1-bit quantization (3.1% of the floating-point baseline bandwidth) achieves 99.8% of the floating-point baseline accuracy at almost the same convergence rate on MNIST, representing the best known bandwidth-accuracy tradeoff to the best of the authors' knowledge.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Information Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network
π
π
The Cartographer
Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication
π
π
The Cartographer
An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted