A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis

August 31, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elizabeth A. Hobson, Matthew J. Silk, Nina H. Fefferman, Daniel B. Larremore, Puck Rombach, Saray Shai, Noa Pinter-Wollman arXiv ID 2012.04720 Category cs.SI: Social & Info Networks Cross-listed physics.soc-ph Citations 54 Venue Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Analyzing social networks is challenging. Key features of relational data require the use of non-standard statistical methods such as developing system-specific null, or reference, models that randomize one or more components of the observed data. Here we review a variety of randomization procedures that generate reference models for social network analysis. Reference models provide an expectation for hypothesis-testing when analyzing network data. We outline the key stages in producing an effective reference model and detail four approaches for generating reference distributions: permutation, resampling, sampling from a distribution, and generative models. We highlight when each type of approach would be appropriate and note potential pitfalls for researchers to avoid. Throughout, we illustrate our points with examples from a simulated social system. Our aim is to provide social network researchers with a deeper understanding of analytical approaches to enhance their confidence when tailoring reference models to specific research questions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Social & Info Networks

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted