Achieving Security and Privacy in Federated Learning Systems: Survey, Research Challenges and Future Directions

December 12, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Engineering applications of artificial intelligence

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alberto Blanco-Justicia, Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Sergio MartΓ­nez, David SΓ‘nchez, Adrian Flanagan, Kuan Eeik Tan arXiv ID 2012.06810 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 138 Venue Engineering applications of artificial intelligence Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) allows a server to learn a machine learning (ML) model across multiple decentralized clients that privately store their own training data. In contrast with centralized ML approaches, FL saves computation to the server and does not require the clients to outsource their private data to the server. However, FL is not free of issues. On the one hand, the model updates sent by the clients at each training epoch might leak information on the clients' private data. On the other hand, the model learnt by the server may be subjected to attacks by malicious clients; these security attacks might poison the model or prevent it from converging. In this paper, we first examine security and privacy attacks to FL and critically survey solutions proposed in the literature to mitigate each attack. Afterwards, we discuss the difficulty of simultaneously achieving security and privacy protection. Finally, we sketch ways to tackle this open problem and attain both security and privacy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted