Cross-Cohort Generalizability of Deep and Conventional Machine Learning for MRI-based Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease
December 16, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π NeuroImage: Clinical
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Esther E. Bron, Stefan Klein, Janne M. Papma, Lize C. Jiskoot, Vikram Venkatraghavan, Jara Linders, Pauline Aalten, Peter Paul De Deyn, Geert Jan Biessels, Jurgen A. H. R. Claassen, Huub A. M. Middelkoop, Marion Smits, Wiro J. Niessen, John C. van Swieten, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Inez H. G. B. Ramakers, Aad van der Lugt
arXiv ID
2012.08769
Category
eess.IV: Image & Video Processing
Cross-listed
cs.CV,
physics.med-ph
Citations
90
Venue
NeuroImage: Clinical
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
This work validates the generalizability of MRI-based classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and controls (CN) to an external data set and to the task of prediction of conversion to AD in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used a conventional support vector machine (SVM) and a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) approach based on structural MRI scans that underwent either minimal pre-processing or more extensive pre-processing into modulated gray matter (GM) maps. Classifiers were optimized and evaluated using cross-validation in the ADNI (334 AD, 520 CN). Trained classifiers were subsequently applied to predict conversion to AD in ADNI MCI patients (231 converters, 628 non-converters) and in the independent Health-RI Parelsnoer data set. From this multi-center study representing a tertiary memory clinic population, we included 199 AD patients, 139 participants with subjective cognitive decline, 48 MCI patients converting to dementia, and 91 MCI patients who did not convert to dementia. AD-CN classification based on modulated GM maps resulted in a similar AUC for SVM (0.940) and CNN (0.933). Application to conversion prediction in MCI yielded significantly higher performance for SVM (0.756) than for CNN (0.742). In external validation, performance was slightly decreased. For AD-CN, it again gave similar AUCs for SVM (0.896) and CNN (0.876). For prediction in MCI, performances decreased for both SVM (0.665) and CNN (0.702). Both with SVM and CNN, classification based on modulated GM maps significantly outperformed classification based on minimally processed images. Deep and conventional classifiers performed equally well for AD classification and their performance decreased only slightly when applied to the external cohort. We expect that this work on external validation contributes towards translation of machine learning to clinical practice.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Image & Video Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Algorithm Unrolling: Interpretable, Efficient Deep Learning for Signal and Image Processing
R.I.P.
π
404 Not Found
Lightweight Image Super-Resolution with Information Multi-distillation Network
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning on Image Denoising: An overview
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted