Near-Optimal Statistical Query Hardness of Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise

December 17, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane arXiv ID 2012.09720 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CC, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 28 Venue Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces with Massart noise. Given labeled samples $(x, y)$ from a distribution $D$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d} \times \{ \pm 1\}$ such that the marginal $D_x$ on the examples is arbitrary and the label $y$ of example $x$ is generated from the target halfspace corrupted by a Massart adversary with flipping probability $ฮท(x) \leq ฮท\leq 1/2$, the goal is to compute a hypothesis with small misclassification error. The best known $\mathrm{poly}(d, 1/ฮต)$-time algorithms for this problem achieve error of $ฮท+ฮต$, which can be far from the optimal bound of $\mathrm{OPT}+ฮต$, where $\mathrm{OPT} = \mathbf{E}_{x \sim D_x} [ฮท(x)]$. While it is known that achieving $\mathrm{OPT}+o(1)$ error requires super-polynomial time in the Statistical Query model, a large gap remains between known upper and lower bounds. In this work, we essentially characterize the efficient learnability of Massart halfspaces in the Statistical Query (SQ) model. Specifically, we show that no efficient SQ algorithm for learning Massart halfspaces on $\mathbb{R}^d$ can achieve error better than $ฮฉ(ฮท)$, even if $\mathrm{OPT} = 2^{-\log^{c} (d)}$, for any universal constant $c \in (0, 1)$. Furthermore, when the noise upper bound $ฮท$ is close to $1/2$, our error lower bound becomes $ฮท- o_ฮท(1)$, where the $o_ฮท(1)$ term goes to $0$ when $ฮท$ approaches $1/2$. Our results provide strong evidence that known learning algorithms for Massart halfspaces are nearly best possible, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem in learning theory.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted