List-decodability with large radius for Reed-Solomon codes

December 19, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Asaf Ferber, Matthew Kwan, Lisa Sauermann arXiv ID 2012.10584 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed math.CO Citations 19 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
List-decodability of Reed-Solomon codes has received a lot of attention, but the best-possible dependence between the parameters is still not well-understood. In this work, we focus on the case where the list-decoding radius is of the form $r=1-\varepsilon$ for $\varepsilon$ tending to zero. Our main result states that there exist Reed-Solomon codes with rate $Ξ©(\varepsilon)$ which are $(1-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-list-decodable, meaning that any Hamming ball of radius $1-\varepsilon$ contains at most $O(1/\varepsilon)$ codewords. This trade-off between rate and list-decoding radius is best-possible for any code with list size less than exponential in the block length. By achieving this trade-off between rate and list-decoding radius we improve a recent result of Guo, Li, Shangguan, Tamo, and Wootters, and resolve the main motivating question of their work. Moreover, while their result requires the field to be exponentially large in the block length, we only need the field size to be polynomially large (and in fact, almost-linear suffices). We deduce our main result from a more general theorem, in which we prove good list-decodability properties of random puncturings of any given code with very large distance.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted