A Comparison of Static, Dynamic, and Hybrid Analysis for Malware Detection

March 13, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Anusha Damodaran, Fabio Di Troia, Visaggio Aaron Corrado, Thomas H. Austin, Mark Stamp arXiv ID 2203.09938 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 406 Venue Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In this research, we compare malware detection techniques based on static, dynamic, and hybrid analysis. Specifically, we train Hidden Markov Models (HMMs ) on both static and dynamic feature sets and compare the resulting detection rates over a substantial number of malware families. We also consider hybrid cases, where dynamic analysis is used in the training phase, with static techniques used in the detection phase, and vice versa. In our experiments, a fully dynamic approach generally yields the best detection rates. We discuss the implications of this research for malware detection based on hybrid techniques.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted