Scaling Up Maximal k-plex Enumeration

March 21, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Qiangqiang Dai, Rong-Hua Li, Hongchao Qin, Meihao Liao, Guoren Wang arXiv ID 2203.10760 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 28 Venue International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Finding all maximal $k$-plexes on networks is a fundamental research problem in graph analysis due to many important applications, such as community detection, biological graph analysis, and so on. A $k$-plex is a subgraph in which every vertex is adjacent to all but at most $k$ vertices within the subgraph. In this paper, we study the problem of enumerating all large maximal $k$-plexes of a graph and develop several new and efficient techniques to solve the problem. Specifically, we first propose several novel upper-bounding techniques to prune unnecessary computations during the enumeration procedure. We show that the proposed upper bounds can be computed in linear time. Then, we develop a new branch-and-bound algorithm with a carefully-designed pivot re-selection strategy to enumerate all $k$-plexes, which outputs all $k$-plexes in $O(n^2Ξ³_k^n)$ time theoretically, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph and $Ξ³_k$ is strictly smaller than 2. In addition, a parallel version of the proposed algorithm is further developed to scale up to process large real-world graphs. Finally, extensive experimental results show that the proposed sequential algorithm can achieve up to $2\times$ to $100\times$ speedup over the state-of-the-art sequential algorithms on most benchmark graphs. The results also demonstrate the high scalability of the proposed parallel algorithm. For example, on a large real-world graph with more than 200 million edges, our parallel algorithm can finish the computation within two minutes, while the state-of-the-art parallel algorithm cannot terminate within 24 hours.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted