Algorithms and Barriers in the Symmetric Binary Perceptron Model

March 29, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors David Gamarnik, Eren C. KฤฑzฤฑldaฤŸ, Will Perkins, Changji Xu arXiv ID 2203.15667 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS, math-ph, math.PR Citations 42 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
The symmetric binary perceptron ($\texttt{SBP}$) exhibits a dramatic statistical-to-computational gap: the densities at which known efficient algorithms find solutions are far below the threshold for the existence of solutions. Furthermore, the $\texttt{SBP}$ exhibits a striking structural property: at all positive constraint densities almost all of its solutions are 'totally frozen' singletons separated by large Hamming distance \cite{perkins2021frozen,abbe2021proof}. This suggests that finding a solution to the $\texttt{SBP}$ may be computationally intractable. At the same time, the $\texttt{SBP}$ does admit polynomial-time search algorithms at low enough densities. A conjectural explanation for this conundrum was put forth in \cite{baldassi2020clustering}: efficient algorithms succeed in the face of freezing by finding exponentially rare clusters of large size. However, it was discovered recently that such rare large clusters exist at all subcritical densities, even at those well above the limits of known efficient algorithms \cite{abbe2021binary}. Thus the driver of the statistical-to-computational gap exhibited by this model remains a mystery. In this paper, we conduct a different landscape analysis to explain the algorithmic tractability of this problem. We show that at high enough densities the $\texttt{SBP}$ exhibits the multi Overlap Gap Property ($m-$OGP), an intricate geometrical property known to be a rigorous barrier for large classes of algorithms. Our analysis shows that the $m-$OGP threshold (a) is well below the satisfiability threshold; and (b) matches the best known algorithmic threshold up to logarithmic factors as $m\to\infty$. We then prove that the $m-$OGP rules out the class of stable algorithms for the $\texttt{SBP}$ above this threshold. We conjecture that the $m \to \infty$ limit of the $m$-OGP threshold marks the algorithmic threshold for the problem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity