Almost-Linear Planted Cliques Elude the Metropolis Process
April 05, 2022 · Declared Dead · 🏛 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Zongchen Chen, Elchanan Mossel, Ilias Zadik
arXiv ID
2204.01911
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.PR,
math.ST
Citations
17
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
A seminal work of Jerrum (1992) showed that large cliques elude the Metropolis process. More specifically, Jerrum showed that the Metropolis algorithm cannot find a clique of size $k=Θ(n^α), α\in (0,1/2)$, which is planted in the Erdős-Rényi random graph $G(n,1/2)$, in polynomial time. Information theoretically it is possible to find such planted cliques as soon as $k \ge (2+ε) \log n$. Since the work of Jerrum, the computational problem of finding a planted clique in $G(n,1/2)$ was studied extensively and many polynomial time algorithms were shown to find the planted clique if it is of size $k = Ω(\sqrt{n})$, while no polynomial-time algorithm is known to work when $k=o(\sqrt{n})$. Notably, the first evidence of the problem's algorithmic hardness is commonly attributed to the result of Jerrum from 1992. In this paper we revisit the original Metropolis algorithm suggested by Jerrum. Interestingly, we find that the Metropolis algorithm actually fails to recover a planted clique of size $k=Θ(n^α)$ for any constant $0 \leq α< 1$. Moreover, we strengthen Jerrum's results in a number of other ways including: Like many results in the MCMC literature, the result of Jerrum shows that there exists a starting state (which may depend on the instance) for which the Metropolis algorithm fails. For a wide range of temperatures, we show that the algorithm fails when started at the most natural initial state, which is the empty clique. This answers an open problem stated in Jerrum (1992). We also show that the simulated tempering version of the Metropolis algorithm, a more sophisticated temperature-exchange variant of it, also fails at the same regime of parameters. Finally, our results confirm recent predictions by Gamarnik and Zadik (2019) and Angelini, Fachin, de Feo (2021).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
📜 Similar Papers
In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms
📚
📚
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
📚
📚
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted