Maintaining Expander Decompositions via Sparse Cuts
April 05, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yiding Hua, Rasmus Kyng, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Zihang Wu
arXiv ID
2204.02519
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
9
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
In this article, we show that the algorithm of maintaining expander decompositions in graphs undergoing edge deletions directly by removing sparse cuts repeatedly can be made efficient. Formally, for an $m$-edge undirected graph $G$, we say a cut $(S, \overline{S})$ is $Ο$-sparse if $|E_G(S, \overline{S})| < Ο\cdot \min\{vol_G(S), vol_G(\overline{S})\}$. A $Ο$-expander decomposition of $G$ is a partition of $V$ into sets $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_k$ such that each cluster $G[X_i]$ contains no $Ο$-sparse cut (meaning it is a $Ο$-expander) with $\tilde{O}(Οm)$ edges crossing between clusters. A natural way to compute a $Ο$-expander decomposition is to decompose clusters by $Ο$-sparse cuts until no such cut is contained in any cluster. We show that even in graphs undergoing edge deletions, a slight relaxation of this meta-algorithm can be implemented efficiently with amortized update time $m^{o(1)}/Ο^2$. Our approach naturally extends to maintaining directed $Ο$-expander decompositions and $Ο$-expander hierarchies and thus gives a unifying framework while having simpler proofs than previous state-of-the-art work. In all settings, our algorithm matches the run-times of previous algorithms up to subpolynomial factors. Moreover, our algorithm provides stronger guarantees for $Ο$-expander decompositions. For example, for graphs undergoing edge deletions, our approach is the first to maintain a dynamic expander decomposition where each updated decomposition is a refinement of the previous decomposition, and our approach is the first to guarantee a sublinear $Οm^{1+o(1)}$ bound on the total number of edges that cross between clusters across the entire sequence of dynamic updates.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted