On Maximizing Sums of Non-monotone Submodular and Linear Functions

May 31, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Algorithmica

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Benjamin Qi arXiv ID 2205.15874 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 19 Venue Algorithmica Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of Regularized Unconstrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedUSM) as defined by Bodek and Feldman [BF22]. In this problem, you are given a non-monotone non-negative submodular function $f:2^{\mathcal N}\to \mathbb R_{\ge 0}$ and a linear function $\ell:2^{\mathcal N}\to \mathbb R$ over the same ground set $\mathcal N$, and the objective is to output a set $T\subseteq \mathcal N$ approximately maximizing the sum $f(T)+\ell(T)$. Specifically, an algorithm is said to provide an $(Ξ±,Ξ²)$-approximation for RegularizedUSM if it outputs a set $T$ such that $\mathbb E[f(T)+\ell(T)]\ge \max_{S\subseteq \mathcal N}[Ξ±\cdot f(S)+Ξ²\cdot \ell(S)]$. We also study the setting where $S$ and $T$ are subject to a matroid constraint, which we refer to as Regularized Constrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedCSM). For both RegularizedUSM and RegularizedCSM, we provide improved $(Ξ±,Ξ²)$-approximation algorithms for the cases of non-positive $\ell$, non-negative $\ell$, and unconstrained $\ell$. In particular, for the case of unconstrained $\ell$, we are the first to provide nontrivial $(Ξ±,Ξ²)$-approximations for RegularizedCSM, and the $Ξ±$ we obtain for RegularizedUSM is superior to that of [BF22] for all $Ξ²\in (0,1)$. In addition to approximation algorithms, we provide improved inapproximability results for all of the aforementioned cases. In particular, we show that the $Ξ±$ our algorithm obtains for RegularizedCSM with unconstrained $\ell$ is tight for $Ξ²\ge \frac{e}{e+1}$. We also show 0.478-inapproximability for maximizing a submodular function where $S$ and $T$ are subject to a cardinality constraint, improving the long-standing 0.491-inapproximability result due to Gharan and Vondrak [GV10].
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted