Decremental Matching in General Graphs

July 03, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sepehr Assadi, Aaron Bernstein, Aditi Dudeja arXiv ID 2207.00927 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 9 Venue International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the problem of maintaining an approximate maximum integral matching in a dynamic graph $G$, while the adversary makes changes to the edges of the graph. The goal is to maintain a $(1+Ξ΅)$-approximate maximum matching for constant $Ξ΅>0$, while minimizing the update time. In the fully dynamic setting, where both edge insertion and deletions are allowed, Gupta and Peng (see \cite{GP13}) gave an algorithm for this problem with an update time of $O(\sqrt{m}/Ξ΅^2)$. Motivated by the fact that the $O_Ξ΅(\sqrt{m})$ barrier is hard to overcome (see Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai, and Saranurak [HKNS15]); Kopelowitz, Pettie, and Porat [KPP16]), we study this problem in the \emph{decremental} model, where the adversary is only allowed to delete edges. Recently, Bernstein, Probst-Gutenberg, and Saranurak (see [BPT20]) gave an $O_Ξ΅(1)$ update time decremental algorithm for this problem in \emph{bipartite graphs}. However, beating $O(\sqrt{m})$ update time remained an open problem for \emph{general graphs}. In this paper, we bridge the gap between bipartite and general graphs, by giving an $O_Ξ΅(1)$ update time algorithm that maintains a $(1+Ξ΅)$-approximate maximum integral matching under adversarial deletions. Our algorithm is randomized, but works against an adaptive adversary. Together with the work of Grandoni, Leonardi, Sankowski, Schwiegelshohn, and Solomon [GLSSS19] who give an $O_Ξ΅(1)$ update time algorithm for general graphs in the \emph{incremental} (insertion-only) model, our result essentially completes the picture for partially dynamic matching.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted