Pandora Box Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection: Hardness and Approximation Scheme

July 19, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hu Fu, Jiawei Li, Daogao Liu arXiv ID 2207.09545 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.GT Citations 21 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Weitzman (1979) introduced the Pandora Box problem as a model for sequential search with inspection costs, and gave an elegant index-based policy that attains provably optimal expected payoff. In various scenarios, the searching agent may select an option without making a costly inspection. The variant of the Pandora box problem with non-obligatory inspection has attracted interest from both economics and algorithms researchers. Various simple algorithms have proved suboptimal, with the best known 0.8-approximation algorithm due to Guha et al. (2008). No hardness result for the problem was known. In this work, we show that it is NP-hard to compute an optimal policy for Pandora's problem with nonobligatory inspection. We also give a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) that computes policies with an expected payoff at least $(1 - Ξ΅)$-fraction of the optimal, for arbitrarily small $Ξ΅> 0$. On the side, we show the decision version of the problem to be in NP.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted