๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
A simple and sharper proof of the hypergraph Moore bound
July 22, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jun-Ting Hsieh, Pravesh K. Kothari, Sidhanth Mohanty
arXiv ID
2207.10850
Category
math.CO: Combinatorics
Cross-listed
cs.DM,
cs.DS
Citations
26
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
The hypergraph Moore bound is an elegant statement that characterizes the extremal trade-off between the girth - the number of hyperedges in the smallest cycle or even cover (a subhypergraph with all degrees even) and size - the number of hyperedges in a hypergraph. For graphs (i.e., $2$-uniform hypergraphs), a bound tight up to the leading constant was proven in a classical work of Alon, Hoory and Linial [AHL02]. For hypergraphs of uniformity $k>2$, an appropriate generalization was conjectured by Feige [Fei08]. The conjecture was settled up to an additional $\log^{4k+1} n$ factor in the size in a recent work of Guruswami, Kothari and Manohar [GKM21]. Their argument relies on a connection between the existence of short even covers and the spectrum of a certain randomly signed Kikuchi matrix. Their analysis, especially for the case of odd $k$, is significantly complicated. In this work, we present a substantially simpler and shorter proof of the hypergraph Moore bound. Our key idea is the use of a new reweighted Kikuchi matrix and an edge deletion step that allows us to drop several involved steps in [GKM21]'s analysis such as combinatorial bucketing of rows of the Kikuchi matrix and the use of the Schudy-Sviridenko polynomial concentration. Our simpler proof also obtains tighter parameters: in particular, the argument gives a new proof of the classical Moore bound of [AHL02] with no loss (the proof in [GKM21] loses a $\log^3 n$ factor), and loses only a single logarithmic factor for all $k>2$-uniform hypergraphs. As in [GKM21], our ideas naturally extend to yield a simpler proof of the full trade-off for strongly refuting smoothed instances of constraint satisfaction problems with similarly improved parameters.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Combinatorics
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
On cap sets and the group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Generalized Twisted Gabidulin Codes
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Tables of subspace codes
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Classification of weighted networks through mesoscale homological features
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal