WiVelo: Fine-grained Walking Velocity Estimation for Wi-Fi Passive Tracking

July 28, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks

๐Ÿ’€ CAUSE OF DEATH: 404 Not Found
Code link is broken/dead
Authors Chenning Li, Li Liu, Zhichao Cao, Mi Zhang arXiv ID 2207.14072 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed eess.SP Citations 3 Venue Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks Repository https://github.com/liecn/WiVelo\_SECON22}} Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Passive human tracking via Wi-Fi has been researched broadly in the past decade. Besides straight-forward anchor point localization, velocity is another vital sign adopted by the existing approaches to infer user trajectory. However, state-of-the-art Wi-Fi velocity estimation relies on Doppler-Frequency-Shift (DFS) which suffers from the inevitable signal noise incurring unbounded velocity errors, further degrading the tracking accuracy. In this paper, we present WiVelo\footnote{Code\&datasets are available at \textit{https://github.com/liecn/WiVelo\_SECON22}} that explores new spatial-temporal signal correlation features observed from different antennas to achieve accurate velocity estimation. First, we use subcarrier shift distribution (SSD) extracted from channel state information (CSI) to define two correlation features for direction and speed estimation, separately. Then, we design a mesh model calculated by the antennas' locations to enable a fine-grained velocity estimation with bounded direction error. Finally, with the continuously estimated velocity, we develop an end-to-end trajectory recovery algorithm to mitigate velocity outliers with the property of walking velocity continuity. We implement WiVelo on commodity Wi-Fi hardware and extensively evaluate its tracking accuracy in various environments. The experimental results show our median and 90\% tracking errors are 0.47~m and 1.06~m, which are half and a quarter of state-of-the-arts.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ’€ 404 Not Found