Archimedes Meets Privacy: On Privately Estimating Quantiles in High Dimensions Under Minimal Assumptions

August 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Neural Information Processing Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Omri Ben-Eliezer, Dan Mikulincer, Ilias Zadik arXiv ID 2208.07438 Category math.ST Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.DS, math.MG Citations 8 Venue Neural Information Processing Systems Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The last few years have seen a surge of work on high dimensional statistics under privacy constraints, mostly following two main lines of work: the ``worst case'' line, which does not make any distributional assumptions on the input data; and the ``strong assumptions'' line, which assumes that the data is generated from specific families, e.g., subgaussian distributions. In this work we take a middle ground, obtaining new differentially private algorithms with polynomial sample complexity for estimating quantiles in high-dimensions, as well as estimating and sampling points of high Tukey depth, all working under very mild distributional assumptions. From the technical perspective, our work relies upon deep robustness results in the convex geometry literature, demonstrating how such results can be used in a private context. Our main object of interest is the (convex) floating body (FB), a notion going back to Archimedes, which is a robust and well studied high-dimensional analogue of the interquantile range. We show how one can privately, and with polynomially many samples, (a) output an approximate interior point of the FB -- e.g., ``a typical user'' in a high-dimensional database -- by leveraging the robustness of the Steiner point of the FB; and at the expense of polynomially many more samples, (b) produce an approximate uniform sample from the FB, by constructing a private noisy projection oracle.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” math.ST

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted