Low-Latency Sliding Window Algorithms for Formal Languages

September 29, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Moses Ganardi, Louis Jachiet, Markus Lohrey, Thomas Schwentick arXiv ID 2209.14835 Category cs.FL: Formal Languages Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 1 Venue Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Low-latency sliding window algorithms for regular and context-free languages are studied, where latency refers to the worst-case time spent for a single window update or query. For every regular language $L$ it is shown that there exists a constant-latency solution that supports adding and removing symbols independently on both ends of the window (the so-called two-way variable-size model). We prove that this result extends to all visibly pushdown languages. For deterministic 1-counter languages we present a $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ latency sliding window algorithm for the two-way variable-size model where $n$ refers to the window size. We complement these results with a conditional lower bound: there exists a fixed real-time deterministic context-free language $L$ such that, assuming the OMV (online matrix vector multiplication) conjecture, there is no sliding window algorithm for $L$ with latency $n^{1/2-ฮต}$ for any $ฮต>0$, even in the most restricted sliding window model (one-way fixed-size model). The above mentioned results all refer to the unit-cost RAM model with logarithmic word size. For regular languages we also present a refined picture using word sizes $\mathcal{O}(1)$, $\mathcal{O}(\log\log n)$, and $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Formal Languages