The privacy issue of counterfactual explanations: explanation linkage attacks

October 21, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sofie Goethals, Kenneth Sรถrensen, David Martens arXiv ID 2210.12051 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.CY Citations 36 Venue ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Black-box machine learning models are being used in more and more high-stakes domains, which creates a growing need for Explainable AI (XAI). Unfortunately, the use of XAI in machine learning introduces new privacy risks, which currently remain largely unnoticed. We introduce the explanation linkage attack, which can occur when deploying instance-based strategies to find counterfactual explanations. To counter such an attack, we propose k-anonymous counterfactual explanations and introduce pureness as a new metric to evaluate the validity of these k-anonymous counterfactual explanations. Our results show that making the explanations, rather than the whole dataset, k- anonymous, is beneficial for the quality of the explanations.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted