Streaming Euclidean Max-Cut: Dimension vs Data Reduction

November 10, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xiaoyu Chen, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Robert Krauthgamer arXiv ID 2211.05293 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 11 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Max-Cut is a fundamental problem that has been studied extensively in various settings. We design an algorithm for Euclidean Max-Cut, where the input is a set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, in the model of dynamic geometric streams, where the input $X\subseteq [Ξ”]^d$ is presented as a sequence of point insertions and deletions. Previously, Frahling and Sohler [STOC 2005] designed a $(1+Ξ΅)$-approximation algorithm for the low-dimensional regime, i.e., it uses space $\exp(d)$. To tackle this problem in the high-dimensional regime, which is of growing interest, one must improve the dependence on the dimension $d$, ideally to space complexity $\mathrm{poly}(Ξ΅^{-1} d \logΞ”)$. Lammersen, Sidiropoulos, and Sohler [WADS 2009] proved that Euclidean Max-Cut admits dimension reduction with target dimension $d' = \mathrm{poly}(Ξ΅^{-1})$. Combining this with the aforementioned algorithm that uses space $\exp(d')$, they obtain an algorithm whose overall space complexity is indeed polynomial in $d$, but unfortunately exponential in $Ξ΅^{-1}$. We devise an alternative approach of \emph{data reduction}, based on importance sampling, and achieve space bound $\mathrm{poly}(Ξ΅^{-1} d \logΞ”)$, which is exponentially better (in $Ξ΅$) than the dimension-reduction approach. To implement this scheme in the streaming model, we employ a randomly-shifted quadtree to construct a tree embedding. While this is a well-known method, a key feature of our algorithm is that the embedding's distortion $O(d\logΞ”)$ affects only the space complexity, and the approximation ratio remains $1+Ξ΅$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted