The Randomized $k$-Server Conjecture is False!
November 10, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
SΓ©bastien Bubeck, Christian Coester, Yuval Rabani
arXiv ID
2211.05753
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.MG
Citations
27
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We prove a few new lower bounds on the randomized competitive ratio for the $k$-server problem and other related problems, resolving some long-standing conjectures. In particular, for metrical task systems (MTS) we asympotically settle the competitive ratio and obtain the first improvement to an existential lower bound since the introduction of the model 35 years ago (in 1987). More concretely, we show: 1. There exist $(k+1)$-point metric spaces in which the randomized competitive ratio for the $k$-server problem is $Ξ©(\log^2 k)$. This refutes the folklore conjecture (which is known to hold in some families of metrics) that in all metric spaces with at least $k+1$ points, the competitive ratio is $Ξ(\log k)$. 2. Consequently, there exist $n$-point metric spaces in which the randomized competitive ratio for MTS is $Ξ©(\log^2 n)$. This matches the upper bound that holds for all metrics. The previously best existential lower bound was $Ξ©(\log n)$ (which was known to be tight for some families of metrics). 3. For all $k<n\in\mathbb N$, for *all* $n$-point metric spaces the randomized $k$-server competitive ratio is at least $Ξ©(\log k)$, and consequently the randomized MTS competitive ratio is at least $Ξ©(\log n)$. These universal lower bounds are asymptotically tight. The previous bounds were $Ξ©(\log k/\log\log k)$ and $Ξ©(\log n/\log \log n)$, respectively. 4. The randomized competitive ratio for the $w$-set metrical service systems problem, and its equivalent width-$w$ layered graph traversal problem, is $Ξ©(w^2)$. This slightly improves the previous lower bound and matches the recently discovered upper bound. 5. Our results imply improved lower bounds for other problems like $k$-taxi, distributed paging and metric allocation. These lower bounds share a common thread, and other than the third bound, also a common construction.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Relief-Based Feature Selection: Introduction and Review
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted