Õptimal Differentially Private Learning of Thresholds and Quasi-Concave Optimization

November 11, 2022 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Symposium on the Theory of Computing

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Edith Cohen, Xin Lyu, Jelani Nelson, Tamás Sarlós, Uri Stemmer arXiv ID 2211.06387 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.DS Citations 23 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The problem of learning threshold functions is a fundamental one in machine learning. Classical learning theory implies sample complexity of $O(ξ^{-1} \log(1/β))$ (for generalization error $ξ$ with confidence $1-β$). The private version of the problem, however, is more challenging and in particular, the sample complexity must depend on the size $|X|$ of the domain. Progress on quantifying this dependence, via lower and upper bounds, was made in a line of works over the past decade. In this paper, we finally close the gap for approximate-DP and provide a nearly tight upper bound of $\tilde{O}(\log^* |X|)$, which matches a lower bound by Alon et al (that applies even with improper learning) and improves over a prior upper bound of $\tilde{O}((\log^* |X|)^{1.5})$ by Kaplan et al. We also provide matching upper and lower bounds of $\tildeΘ(2^{\log^*|X|})$ for the additive error of private quasi-concave optimization (a related and more general problem). Our improvement is achieved via the novel Reorder-Slice-Compute paradigm for private data analysis which we believe will have further applications.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Machine Learning

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted