A Cut-Matching Game for Constant-Hop Expanders

November 21, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Bernhard Haeupler, Jonas Huebotter, Mohsen Ghaffari arXiv ID 2211.11726 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DC, math.CO Citations 14 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
This paper extends and generalizes the well-known cut-matching game framework and provides a novel cut-strategy that produces constant-hop expanders. Constant-hop expanders are a significant strengthening of regular expanders with the additional guarantee that any demand can be (obliviously) routed along constant-hop flow-paths - in contrast to the $Ξ©(\log n)$-hop paths in expanders. Cut-matching games for expanders are key tools for obtaining linear-time approximation algorithms for many hard problems, including finding (balanced or approximately-largest) sparse cuts, certifying the expansion of a graph by embedding an (explicit) expander, as well as computing expander decompositions, hierarchical cut decompositions, oblivious routings, multi-cuts, and multi-commodity flows. The cut-matching game of this paper is crucial in extending this versatile and powerful machinery to constant-hop and length-constrained expanders and has been already been extensively used. For example, as a key ingredient in several recent breakthroughs, including, computing constant-approximate $k$-commodity (min-cost) flows in $(m+k)^{1+Ξ΅}$ time as well as the optimal constant-approximate deterministic worst-case fully-dynamic APSP-distance oracle - in all applications the constant-approximation factor directly traces to and crucially relies on the expanders from a cut-matching game guaranteeing constant-hop routing paths.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted